TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Everyone Counts Initiative
Our work on Digital ID & Exclusion
The Everyone Counts initiative was launched in the fall of 2020 with a firm commitment to a simple principle: the digital transformation of the state can only qualify as a success if everyone’s human rights are respected. Nowhere is this more urgent than in the context of so-called digital ID systems, which often form the basis for so-called ‘digital public infrastructure.’
Research, litigation, and broader advocacy on digital ID in countries like India and Kenya has already revealed the dangers of exclusion from digital ID for ethnic minority groups and for people living in poverty. However, a significant gap still exists between the magnitude of the human rights risks involved and the enthusiasm surrounding digital ID among many national and international policymakers. Despite their active promotion and use by governments, international organizations, and the private sector, in many cases these digital ID systems are leading to social exclusion and human rights violations, especially for the poorest and most marginalized.
As more and more governments turn to digital ID to form the ‘foundation’ for digital public infrastructure, there is a critical need for greater engagement from human rights actors. Therefore, the Everyone Counts initiative aims to engage in research, action, and network-building to address social exclusion and related human rights violations that are facilitated by digital ID systems and other government platforms.
Together with partners, we undertake empirical human rights research investigating how introducing digital ID systems may heighten the risk of harm, exacerbate social exclusion, and violate human rights. Our research is based on the notion that there is inherent and instrumental value in listening to and documenting how individuals experience digital systems, in order to understand how those experiences affect their rights and dignity.
The role of international organizations in promoting digital ID
In our 2022 report, “Paving a Digital Road to Hell? A Primer on the Role of the World Bank and Global Networks in Promoting Digital ID,” we sound the alarm about the dangers of national biometric digital ID systems.
- We identify the World Bank and its Identification for Development (ID4D) Initiative as playing a central role in manufacturing a new development consensus on digital ID. This consensus uses the language of development and human rights, but often aims to provide a form of economic identity that is delinked from legal status and human rights. These new systems are of urgent concern to all of those interested in safeguarding human rights, due to the growing evidence that such digital ID systems can cause serious harm.
- In this primer, which draws on the work of many experts and activists working in related fields, we present a carefully researched account of what these new models of ‘economic identity’ look like.
- We also outline some of the key actors who have been involved in packaging and promoting this consensus.
- We conclude with some practical suggestions for the human rights ecosystem to consider in ensuring that human rights are safeguarded in the implementation of digital ID systems.Press Release: The World Bank and co. may be paving a ‘Digital Road to Hell’ with support for dangerous digital ID Full report: “Paving A Digital Road to Hell? A Primer on the Role of the World Bank and Global Networks in Promoting Digital ID”
Mass exclusion from Uganda’s national digital ID system
Our 2021 report, Chased Away and Left to Die, documents the wholesale exclusion of large swaths of the Ugandan population from its national digital ID system, Ndaga Muntu.
- Based on 7 months of research together with our Ugandan partners the Initiative for Social and Economic Rights (ISER) and Unwanted Witness, the report takes an in-depth look at the implications of exclusion for pregnant women and older persons attempting to access their rights to health and social protection.
- Since Ndaga Muntu is now required to access government and private services, including to access health care and social benefits, to vote, get a bank account, and obtain a mobile phone, exclusion from the national digital ID has become a life and death matter. Press Release: ‘Chased Away and Left to Die’: New human rights report finds that Uganda’s national digital ID system leads to mass exclusion False Promises and Multiple Exclusion: Summary of Our RightsCon Event on Uganda’s National Digital ID System (RightsCon Session) Uganda National Digital ID YouTube Playlist (individual stories)
The Ugandan government announced that it would be rolling out a new, upgraded version of the digital ID system in the second half of 2024. It intends to add more technological features to the digital ID, and plans to undertake a mass enrollment exercise to register all unregistered Ugandans. Together with our Ugandan partners the Initiative for Social and Economic Rights (ISER) and the Health Equity and Policy Initiative (HEAPI), we published 5 urgent recommendations that the Government must adopt as it designs and rolls out this new digital ID system. We focus on short-term, actionable recommendations that will help concretely improve the Government’s approach and avoid further entrenching the well-documented problems that have affected the current system.
Our presence at a leading university and law school underlines our commitment to high quality and cutting-edge research, but we are not in the business of knowledge accumulation purely for its own sake. We undertake targeted advocacy at the national, regional, and international level to ensure that digital ID systems are not used to exclude and violate human rights.
Supporting strategic litigation against Uganda’s digital ID system
In April 2022, a coalition of civil society organizations in Uganda, including our partners the Initiative for Social and Economic Rights (ISER), Unwanted Witness (UW), alongside the Health Equity and Policy Initiative (HEAPI), filed a lawsuit—ISER & 2 Others v. Attorney General & Another—against the Government of Uganda. The applicants allege that the national digital ID, known as Ndaga Muntu, has become an exclusionary barrier that violates women’s rights to health and older persons’ rights to social security. This lawsuit draws on the extensive evidence documented in our 2021 report produced together with ISER and Unwanted Witness.
In March 2023, the High Court ruled to admit two applications to intervene as amicus curiae, one from Philip Alston on the rights to health, social security, equality and non-discrimination, and the other from a coalition of civil society organizations including CIPESA, Article 19, and Access Now on the rights to privacy and freedom of expression.
- A brief summary of the litigation along with Frequently Asked Questions
- Notice of Motion
- Expert Affidavit from Dr. Tom Fisher, Privacy International
- Expert Affidavit from Dr. Reetika Khera, Professor of Economics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
- Expert Affidavit from Diana Gichengo, Advocate of the High Court of Kenya
Contributions to technical standard-setting processes & increasing accessibility of these processes
In April 2023, we responded to the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) request for comments on Version 4 of the Digital Identity Guidelines, Special Publication 800-63-4, in collaboration with the Institute for Law, Innovation & Technology (iLIT) at Temple University, Beasley School of Law.
- Our comments called on NIST to clarify and enhance key definitions relied on in the guidance, as well as to strengthen guidance on equity risks and highlight specific technical concerns about the management of digital identity, and particularly the use of biometrics.
- We also made practical suggestions for assessing, managing and monitoring equity risks throughout the digital identity cycle, and for strengthening guidance on access to appropriate remedies and redress.
In June 2023, based on our experience of submitting comments to NIST, we published this short document aims to summarize some of our comments, as well as to provide a resource for grassroots organizations, empowering them to engage with technical standards-setting bodies such as NIST and the International Standards Organization to raise human rights concerns related to digitalization.
Further resources:
- Legal Opinion on International and Comparative Human Rights Law Concerning the Matter of the Social Card Law Pending before the Constitutional Court of Serbia, November 2022
- Open letter: World Bank and its donors must protect human rights in digital ID systems, September 2022
- Our Response to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy’s Request for Information on Biometric Identification Technologies, January 2022
- Open letter: Civil society calls on international actors in Afghanistan to secure digital identity and biometric data immediately, August 2021
- Open Letter, CSOs Call for a Full Integration of Human Rights in the Deployment of Digital Identification Systems December 2020
We create physical and virtual spaces for civil society organizations, as well as public and private actors, to come together to exchange information and stories, collaborate, and shape collective action on digital ID systems and exclusion of the poorest and most marginalized.
Workshop Series: How to Resist Exclusion from Digital ID in Africa
In early 2021, we organized a series of workshops in partnership with the UN Economic Commission for Africa and the Open Society Justice Initiative on the topic of digital ID and exclusion in Africa.
- The workshops invited human rights activists from twelve African countries to come together and discuss how the advent of digital ID systems is impacting their work and their communities.
- Participants came from civil society organizations working on a diverse range of issues—including health, education, social protection, and social justice—but found common ground in recognizing that digital ID and digital governance brings the potential to generate significant exclusion and human rights concerns.
- Each workshop in the series aimed to open space for discussion of personal experiences and viewpoints, opportunities to learn from external experts and other participants, and joint strategizing about what actions human rights activists can take to resist exclusion from digital ID systems for the most poor and marginalized.
Civil society coalition-building and global advocacy
Our team plays an active role in global coalitions of civil society organizations, working together to ensure that all digital ID system are inclusive and human rights-centric. Together with our partners—which include both large, international NGOs as well as grassroots community groups—we work to host knowledge sharing sessions, to develop shared resources, and to bring collective concerns into international and regional policy spaces such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, and the International Monetary Fund & World Bank Group Annual Meetings.
Digital ID for Inclusive Development? Emerging evidence on social exclusion and its broader implications Civil Society Policy Forum at the Annual Meeting of the World Bank Group and the International Monetary Fund, September 27–October 8, 2021
- Contesting the Foundations of Digital Public Infrastructure
- Are we harnessing the power of machine learning in social protection?
- The Curse of Cashlessness: Digital Exclusion in Sweden’s Cash-Free Society
- Examining the World Bank’s approach to Digital ID
- EP23: The Dark Side of Identity: Mitigating the Risks (Part 1)
- Left Behind: Defending Socioeconomic Rights in Uganda’s Move Towards Digital Government
- The shifting burdens of digital identities in public service delivery
- Seeing the Unseen: Inclusion and Exclusion in Kenya’s Digital ID System
- For Welfare or for Profit? Aadhaar and the private exploitation of the poor in India
- Serving to Exclude: Impact of Uganda’s Digital IDs on Service Delivery
- Contesting the Foundations of Digital Public Infrastructure: What Digital ID Litigation Can Tell Us About the Future of Digital Government and Society
- Human rights gateway or gatekeeper: Digital IDs on trial in Uganda
- The IRS’s Abandoned Facial Recognition Is Just the Tip of a Harmful Biometric Iceberg
- The Aadhaar Mirage: A Second Look at the World Bank’s “Model” for Digital ID Systems
- The fatal flaw in Uganda’s emergency relief
- “We are not Data Points”: Highlights from our Conversation on the Kenyan Digital ID System
- “Leapfrogging” to Digital Financial Inclusion through “Moonshot” Initiatives
- Marketizing the digital state: the failure of the ‘Verify’ model in the United Kingdom
- Digital Identification and Inclusionary Delusion in West Africa
- Putting Profit Before Welfare: A Closer Look at India’s Digital Identification System
- Digital ID case studies suggest solvable technical issues, but raise fundamental questions
- CoWin Fiasco Should Alert Us to Hidden Agendas Behind Digital Identity-Based Governance
- Podcast: Will digital IDs deliver for the Rwandan people?
- ‘Economic identity’: are digital ID schemes a ‘road to Hell?’ asks human rights report
- FEATURE-Uganda sued over digital ID system that excludes millions
- Industry, civil society weigh in on biometrics policy in letters to White House
- »Oft ist das eine Frage von Leben und Tod«
- Millions of Ugandans denied vital services over digital ID cards
- Uganda’s ID scheme excludes nearly a third from healthcare, says report
- Digital ID not increasing inclusivity as advertised, civil society groups argue